Amid gusting winds, punter Colton Schmidt had another fabulous game. dallascowboysjerseyspop With a running start, he could leap from the foul line to the basket for a dunk. cheap nfl jerseys Marckini won for offense and Jonathas for defense. Her coach Dave Brubaker said she was not fully prepared, while on Twitter, Moors said: all have ups and downs, but thanks to everyone for understanding my downs right now. Everything is on record. Daniel Nielson, 28.

wholesale nba jerseys

This may seem rather high in the minds of many. cheap nfl jerseys Special Counsel for the National Hockey League Players' Association Steve Fehr, right, sitting next to National Hockey League Vice President and Deputy General Counsel Jessica Berman, testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Dec. wholesale mlb jerseys Porzingis who will be 20 during his rookie year has shot it well from deep amid the highest levels of pro ball in Europe.. Esoteric saysa host of local emcees including Akrobatik, Mr. wholesalejerseysi Fortunately, there's a solution get your gal interested in the game! The more she knows, the more involved she'll be.

cheap nba jerseys

Up next for the Spurs would be the Memphis Grizzlies a team that the Spurs were seeking revenge against, after the Grizzlies put the then number one seeded Spurs out in the first round of the playoffs in 2011.. The treasury is almost empty and its currency is under pressure after years of running large deficits. wholesale mlb jerseys It becomes much more flexible, and interesting, but maybe dangerous.". As this is the 150th anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg there will be some Civil War activities at Summerfair. wholesale jerseys Kilometre) fire erupted Saturday afternoon and rapidly chewed through brush and trees parched from several years of drought, Cal Fire said. cheap nfl jerseys Fight back, that the only advice I could give that I truly believed was relevant. Shares of monoline bond insurers with exposure to Puerto Rico's securities fell sharply. miamidolphinsjerseyspop As a result, we experienced improvements across the Company in sales per payroll hour, while maintaining a strong in store service level. wholesale nba jerseys A gripping 2015 NBA Finals, of course, will represent yet another apex in what has been a golden age for the sport. wholesale mlb jerseys Let you know if there is a history of the phernic being injured, or other complications. cheap mlb jerseys He's only put on his uniform 5 times since the beginning of the year and played once against Washington. cheap jerseys For years, sneaker festivals have been bringing sneaker collectors together under one roof to buy, sell and trade as well as mingle and sight see. "Like him, I haven't had a baby, but I think it's probably worse.". wholesale nfl jerseys The remaining $200 million in public financing would be paid back with rent money and admissions taxes from the arena, and if that money falls short, Hansen would be responsible for making up the rest.. That made it easier for James, the most heavily scrutinized player in the league since his departure from Cleveland, when he announced he was "taking his talents to South Beach" on a TV special called "The Decision" that was criticized everywhere from talk shows and water coolers straight to the commissioner's office. CONAN: And we'll be deconstructing all of these events as they happen. Who knows where the evolution of the sandal will be in another 500 years.. Same with all other Indian batsman. The trailers (both standard and the recent red band) touch on scenarios that call out the casual racism still acted out in a supposedly "post racial" America.Although the statements and questions raised by the lead character Samantha White may seem outlandish to some white Americans, for far too many African Americans her rants represent everyday reality.Here are some things called out in the trailers which, if you are doing them, are indeed racist.For those wondering, there's no minimum.It is possible to have never seen a black person in your life and STILL know that certain attitudes and behaviors are inherently wrong!This is why some people must stop using their so called friends as a buffer against being called out for racist behavior.Treating someone like an exotic animal because the texture of their hair "fascinates" you is racist.It disturbing how many people think nothing of approaching a stranger or casual acquaintance and asking to touch their hair, as if they just stepped on Earth from another planet.
Home / Elitism / Globalists / Vote All You Want. The Secret Government Won’t Change
secret-government

Vote All You Want. The Secret Government Won’t Change

secret-gov  Vote All You Want. The Secret Government Won’t Change secret govTHE VOTERS WHO put Barack Obama in office expected some big changes. From the NSA’s warrantless wiretapping to Guantanamo Bay to the Patriot Act, candidate Obama was a defender of civil liberties and privacy, promising a dramatically different approach from his predecessor.  But six years into his administration, the Obama version of national security looks almost indistinguishable from the one he inherited. Guantanamo Bay remains open. The NSA has, if anything, become more aggressive in monitoring Americans. Drone strikes have escalated. Most recently it was reported that the same president who won a Nobel Prize in part for promoting nuclear disarmament is spending up to $1 trillion modernizing and revitalizing America’s nuclear weapons.  Why did the face in the Oval Office change but the policies remain the same? Critics tend to focus on Obama himself, a leader who perhaps has shifted with politics to take a harder line. But Tufts University political scientist Michael J. Glennon has a more pessimistic answer: Obama couldn’t have changed policies much even if he tried.  Though it’s a bedrock American principle that citizens can steer their own government by electing new officials, Glennon suggests that in practice, much of our government no longer works that way. In a new book, “National Security and Double Government,” he catalogs the ways that the defense and national security apparatus is effectively self-governing, with virtually no accountability, transparency, or checks and balances of any kind. He uses the term “double government”: There’s the one we elect, and then there’s the one behind it, steering huge swaths of policy almost unchecked. Elected officials end up serving as mere cover for the real decisions made by the bureaucracy.  Glennon cites the example of Obama and his team being shocked and angry to discover upon taking office that the military gave them only two options for the war in Afghanistan: The United States could add more troops, or the United States could add a lot more troops. Hemmed in, Obama added 30,000 more troops.  Glennon’s critique sounds like an outsider’s take, even a radical one. In fact, he is the quintessential insider: He was legal counsel to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and a consultant to various congressional committees, as well as to the State Department. “National Security and Double Government” comes favorably blurbed by former members of the Defense Department, State Department, White House, and even the CIA. And he’s not a conspiracy theorist: Rather, he sees the problem as one of “smart, hard-working, public-spirited people acting in good faith who are responding to systemic incentives”—without any meaningful oversight to rein them in.  How exactly has double government taken hold? And what can be done about it? Glennon spoke with Ideas from his office at Tufts’ Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. This interview has been condensed and edited.

IDEAS: Where does the term “double government” come from?

GLENNON:It comes from Walter Bagehot’s famous theory, unveiled in the 1860s. Bagehot was the scholar who presided over the birth of the Economist magazine—they still have a column named after him. Bagehot tried to explain in his book “The English Constitution” how the British government worked. He suggested that there are two sets of institutions. There are the “dignified institutions,” the monarchy and the House of Lords, which people erroneously believed ran the government. But he suggested that there was in reality a second set of institutions, which he referred to as the “efficient institutions,” that actually set governmental policy. And those were the House of Commons, the prime minister, and the British cabinet.

IDEAS: What evidence exists for saying America has a double government?

GLENNON:I was curious why a president such as Barack Obama would embrace the very same national security and counterterrorism policies that he campaigned eloquently against. Why would that president continue those same policies in case after case after case? I initially wrote it based on my own experience and personal knowledge and conversations with dozens of individuals in the military, law enforcement, and intelligence agencies of our government, as well as, of course, officeholders on Capitol Hill and in the courts. And the documented evidence in the book is substantial—there are 800 footnotes in the book.

IDEAS: Why would policy makers hand over the national-security keys to unelected officials?

GLENNON: It hasn’t been a conscious decision….Members of Congress are generalists and need to defer to experts within the national security realm, as elsewhere. They are particularly concerned about being caught out on a limb having made a wrong judgment about national security and tend, therefore, to defer to experts, who tend to exaggerate threats. The courts similarly tend to defer to the expertise of the network that defines national security policy.

The presidency itself is not a top-down institution, as many people in the public believe, headed by a president who gives orders and causes the bureaucracy to click its heels and salute. National security policy actually bubbles up from within the bureaucracy. Many of the more controversial policies, from the mining of Nicaragua’s harbors to the NSA surveillance program, originated within the bureaucracy. John Kerry was not exaggerating when he said that some of those programs are “on autopilot.”

IDEAS: Isn’t this just another way of saying that big bureaucracies are difficult to change?

GLENNON: It’s much more serious than that. These particular bureaucracies don’t set truck widths or determine railroad freight rates. They make nerve-center security decisions that in a democracy can be irreversible, that can close down the marketplace of ideas, and can result in some very dire consequences.

IDEAS: Couldn’t Obama’s national-security decisions just result from the difference in vantage point between being a campaigner and being the commander-in-chief, responsible for 320 million lives?

GLENNON: There is an element of what you described. There is not only one explanation or one cause for the amazing continuity of American national security policy. But obviously there is something else going on when policy after policy after policy all continue virtually the same way that they were in the George W. Bush administration.

IDEAS: This isn’t how we’re taught to think of the American political system.

GLENNON: I think the American people are deluded, as Bagehot explained about the British population, that the institutions that provide the public face actually set American national security policy. They believe that when they vote for a president or member of Congress or succeed in bringing a case before the courts, that policy is going to change. Now, there are many counter-examples in which these branches do affect policy, as Bagehot predicted there would be. But the larger picture is still true—policy by and large in the national security realm is made by the concealed institutions.

IDEAS: Do we have any hope of fixing the problem?

GLENNON: The ultimate problem is the pervasive political ignorance on the part of the American people. And indifference to the threat that is emerging from these concealed institutions. That is where the energy for reform has to come from: the American people. Not from government. Government is very much the problem here. The people have to take the bull by the horns. And that’s a very difficult thing to do, because the ignorance is in many ways rational. There is very little profit to be had in learning about, and being active about, problems that you can’t affect, policies that you can’t change.

—————————————————————
[1] Jordan Michael Smith, Vote all you want. The secret government won’t change, The Boston Globe, OCTOBER 19, 2014

 

About Bill Wallace

Bill Wallace is a self-fashioned writter, a computer programmer and cybermarketer from Quebec City, Canada who decided to enter the political arena after his disillusionment with the socialist system under which he was living in the French Canadian province of Quebec.