Despite the fact that humanity is pretty far from colonizing the red planet, the social-justice crowd is already freaking out that it’s going to be an oppressive, white-male dominated society and that we must act now to stop it.  “The last thing we need is to wake up in 50 years and find that a bunch of #gamergate nobheads are running Mars,” Martin Robbins writes in a piece for the Guardian titled, “How Can Our Future Mars Colonies Be Free of Racism and Sexism?” Robbins explains that part of his concern comes from the fact that humans’ colonization of new lands has traditionally been oppressive. “Destiny is rarely great for the people already at the destination,” Robbins explains.  As far as we know, there are no people on Mars. Robins acknowledges that “the only population on Mars that we know of is a handful of rovers,” but explains that his freakout is still totally justified because “no doubt we’ll start a war anyway, before dragging them into some form of slavery and oppression. It’s just what we do.”  Here is the the good part. “Space is white. You just won’t believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly white it is,” Robbins complained. So even though there is no population on Mars that we know of, the evil white man will “no doubt” “start a war anyway” because “that’s just what we do.” According to what he said, the white man is so evil that he’s willing to declare war on something without it existing first. But this idiotic scenario is not Robbins’ only concern. He also claims that movies about space are super sexist and that this will extend to the real-life hypothetical Mars colony! “To paraphrase Douglas Adams: ‘Space is white. You just won’t believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly white it is.’ It’s also very male and European,” Robbins writes. There is no doubts in his mind that once we get the technology to travel into space, we will do exactly like they did in all those movies and science-fiction novels. “Women in space-colony fiction have generally been presented as sexy walking vaginas, whose main purpose is to provide the male astronauts with a place to dock their penis at night. This being necessary in order to ‘ensure the survival of the species.’”  From these dumbass premises, he concludes that “the first woman to be raped in space has probably already been born.” 
Much of Robbins’s article was based on a recent piece by fellow Social Justice Warrior/scientist DN Lee published in The Scientific American that was talking about how the language people use when they discuss colonizing Mars is “problematic,” and that “Diversity, Inclusion, Access and Ethics should be a critical part of these conversations about space science, discovery, exploration, and yes eventual travel and emigration.”  Even if we are not scientists like Lee, simple logic dictates that maybe we should keep our focus on actually getting to Mars before freaking out about its hypothetical colony’s hypothetical microaggressions.  But the black woman doesn’t agree. Maybe “scientist” is a strong word when we apply it to people like DN Lee. She sounds more like a black study professor than a scientist of any kind. Moreover, if you follow the stuff recently published by The Scientific American, it’s easy to see that this publication has been taken over by leftist propagandists and that it has abandonned “science” a long time ago. They are now pushing man made global warming, abortions, white privilege and all the usual crap you can see on MSNBC. So, it’s not surprising to see them publish garbage like “white privilege on Mars.” Like it or not, The Scientific American is now as scientific as Salon, Media Matters, Gawker or Think Progress. A real shame, isn’t it?