When you thought that the liberals couldn’t get any worse, they make another crazy statement. This time it’s a social democrat who thinks mass immigration from the Third World is a way better investment than Swedish people having kids on their own. If you’re reading this then you have, like me, most likely heard about every thinkable excuse for Multiculturalism and Diversity there is. While some may be plausible and sort-of-thought-out but doesn’t quite make it all the way, many are just downright retarded. These excuses usually come from naive liberals who have very little interaction and/or experience with reality, or from hardcore racial-denialists who keep insisting that non-whites inability to function in white, western societies are somehow our own fault. But then there are the really, really dark arguments that make your insides squirm in misery, and you begin to wonder how such evil can be allowed in this world while you suddenly find yourself sharpening wooden stakes in the tool shed. These surface from time to time, but almost never from higher up, and are usually quickly forgotten or hushed because of how sinister they are – even to multiculturalists – which is only proof that most of them don’t really believe the shit they are spewing themselves. This time, true evil surfaced in Sweden with a statement made by
Satan’s devil spawn social democrat and MP, Olle Thorell – who just became a father, and who during a meeting with the City council of Sura on the topic of unaccompanied child refugees, said the following:
Sure, these kids will cost a lot of money the coming years. But these kids are much more profitable than a Swedish baby. They can start paying taxes after 5-8 years, while it would take a Swedish baby 25-30 years.
The implications that can be drawn from a statement like this are so many that you don’t know where to begin. Should Olle kill his newborn and instead adopt a refugee child? Is money everything he can think of and everything that matters? And should refugee children not be allowed to have children of their own later in life and instead be euthanized when they are no longer profitable? (Not that they ever were.) Also note the rhetorical “can start paying taxes” instead of “will”. It also seems to have escaped him that the baby’s parents are the ones who pays for it, not the government.
He has yet to suffer consequences for his statement and I suspect, that as the immigration situation grow more catastrophic in the West, comments like these will be more and more common in a last, deluded effort from the multiculturalists to convince people of how goodhearted and kind they are.
…And got damn it, where did all these stakes come from again?